The department is a lively community that is recognised internationally as one of the top centres for research and teaching in development studies.
OPHI: World's Poorest People Don't Always Live Where You'd Expect
Poverty measures reported at the national level don’t provide a full picture of where the world’s poorest live. New research from the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), based at ODID, has revealed that nearly 60 per cent of people living in the world’s poorest regions are not actually in the least developed countries.
Measuring the different things that people are deprived of, researchers have identified regions within countries where the poorest people live. The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) reflects the combined simultaneous disadvantages poor people experience across different areas of their lives, including education, health and living standards. If people are deprived in at least one-third of ten weighted indicators, they are identified as multidimensionally poor. This poverty measure, MPI, complements income poverty measures.
Using the January 2015 updates of the MPI released today, the study team looked at more than 230 regions within countries where multidimensional poverty is at least as high as the 25 poorest Least Developed Countries (LDCs) identified by the United Nations (Economic and Social Council). They found that nearly 60 per cent of the 768 million multidimensionally poor people in these subnational regions live in countries that are not classified as LDCs, and all but one non-LDC region were in countries classed as middle-income: India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Cameroon, Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana, Namibia and the Republic of Congo.
The findings show that pockets of deprivation are missed in aggregate statistics. For example, in Doula, the largest city in Cameroon, 6.7 per cent of people are multidimensionally poor; yet elsewhere in the same country, in the Extrême-Nord, nearly 87 per cent are measured as MPI-poor. The researchers say the striking disparity would be hidden if we only relied on the figure for the national average, which shows that 46 per cent of the population in Cameroon are MPI-poor.
While Niger has the highest percentage of MPI-poor, with 89.3 per cent of its entire population found to be living in multidimensional poverty, using the same MPI measure the five poorest regions in the world are in Chad and Burkina Faso. The OPHI researchers found that the very poorest region of all the 803 regions studied is Salamat in Chad, where nearly 98 per cent of its 354,000 inhabitants are measured as multidimensionally poor.
Dr Sabina Alkire, Director of OPHI, said: ‘The MPI enables us to examine poverty within regions of a country as well as nationally, and compare the interlocking deprivations people experience. It can reveal experiences across rural and urban areas, and across different ethnic populations. We measure different types of deprivation together – such as malnutrition, poor sanitation, a lack of housing or schooling – and every person matters.’
‘Our findings highlight the value of having good quality, up-to-date and detailed survey data to reveal what life is really like for the poorest section of populations. I'm particularly glad that of the 30 low-income countries covered, we can compare the MPI across regions within countries for all but one.’
The United Nations has stressed the need to identify where the poorest live in order to ‘leave no-one behind’. The researchers argue that their poverty measure, the MPI, is essential to accurately target resources and policies where they are needed most.
The updated global Multidimensional Poverty Index now covers 110 developing countries, and 803 regions in 72 of these countries. The analysis is of data ranging from 2002 to 2014, mainly collected by UNICEF's Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey and USAID's Demographic and Health Survey. The MPI is published in UNDP's Human Development Reports.
- Download a briefing paper on the latest global MPI results, ‘High visibility: How disaggregated metrics help to reduce multidimensional poverty’.